You get 4 planes for 70 bucks, that's 17.50 a plane. And if you're so special and know everything why don't you man up and buy a plane? Go pay 70 bucks and get the PMDG 737 series, then come back and talk. I don't care, I don't need to prove a thing to you. Fill your plane up with however much fuel you want, turn the autopilot on and act like you're somebody. Dude, what is your problem? Why don't you use some of your energy and help the thread in someway? You fly default planes around and I don't. You need to sign your forum posts with your name by the way.
![pmdg 737 fuel planner pmdg 737 fuel planner](https://www.simflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/xfuel_02.png)
I only read what is clearly written in the FMC. If you don't think that is a correct amount open a support ticket with PMDG. Boeing website? if you do own it you should take a look at the FMC 46,057lbs is the max fuel load for the base PMDG 737NGX. Well, this tells me you don't actually own the PMDG 737NGX. If he gets enough input he can add the plane to the drop down box the same way the 737-300 (Wilco) has it's own option.
Pmdg 737 fuel planner download#
Please download and run the free client at the link at the bottom of his webpage. If anyone wants to help AeroTexas improve the fuel usage Garen, the owner, is a great guy who enjoys getting help to improve the website. To the best of my knowledge this fuel suggestion is for the default 737-800 therefore it will not give proper fuel usage for the 738NGX. Keep in mind this is only one example of how AeroTexas is suggesting to much fuel. Therefore if you follow AeroTexas you should load 48,498lbs "Fuel On Board" not anything less.
Pmdg 737 fuel planner plus#
The topic as I understand it for clarity is: Using a flight in the 737-800NGX from KMIA to KLAX the excellent AeroTexas website (which I still say is awesome) recommends a 37,433lbs fuel usage plus 3,502lbs for holding plus 5,254lbs for diversions plus 2,309lbs contingency fuel. If you or someone else decides to use the estimated fuel usage and combine it with their own reserve amount then that is a separate discussion. Did someone say they ran out of fuel while using AeroTexas? As I understand the discussion to this point is that there is too much total fuel being suggested. What does the Eaglesoft Citation X have to do with the 737NGX suggested fuel load? I understand you are using at as an example of not running out of fuel while using the fuel suggestions from AeroTexas but we are not discussing that plane so I don't see the point of bringing it up. The fuel suggested by AeroTexas is way off. So again I repeat what I have already said. You are talking about the estimated fuel usage suggested and I am talking about the total fuel. Are you saying the fuel suggestions are correct and the amount offered should be used? Or are you saying the estimated fuel usage is correct and a different amount should be used for the reserves? It appears we are speaking of two different things here. I suspect we are talking about two different but related things from that website. I honestly still do no understand what you are saying and I'm not saying that to be rude.
![pmdg 737 fuel planner pmdg 737 fuel planner](http://onlineflightplanner.org/assets/fb_share_image-428c2f1a910e81f3cf510ccb883cad87.jpg)
Point-in-fact that you can't even load the total fuel suggested for some of the longer routes. The total fuel suggested by is too much.
![pmdg 737 fuel planner pmdg 737 fuel planner](http://www.fspassengers.com/design/faq_backup_menufsx.jpg)
Who said the estimated fuel usage is "waaaaaaaaay off"? I certainly didn't.